View Single Post
Old 05-23-2007, 11:56 PM   #89
Don Murphy
Administrator
 
Don Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Orci View Post
Just to make sure Don isn't talking about me and Alex, let us again express our sincere respect and gratitude to Don and Tom for representing the fans in a way no fan will ever be able to repay. They stood up for the fans even when it was against what the studio wanted. They were the first to see that this could be a live action movie, and they should only be commended for everything fans like, and not be blamed for anything fans hate.
I never thought for a minute you'd construe this as about you guys. You two fought for the mythology, you fought for a good film, you fought for quality. You wrote a great script that got made. You worked with a demanding director and made him and the studio happy. You are responsible for what will likely be the surprise megahit of the summer. You have only treated me with respect throughout the whole process. ANYTHING good in the film you guys came up with. That's a fact, folks. You guys walk with the angels.

Nice to see you here again too.
__________________
Wikipediots
Members of the Cult of Wikipedia


If Wikipedia is so wonderful a project why does nearly everyone in positions of power insist on anonymity?

If I worked for the Encyclopedia Britannica as an editor or author then I'd put it front and center on my resume. I'd tell prospective clients and customers. I'd tell my family about it. I'd tell my former teachers. I'd put it on my weblog under my real name. I'd do this knowing that EB would stand right behind me to check and validate my scholarship against allcomers.

What is it about Wikipedia that causes the exact opposite psychological response? Because editing and adminning Wikipedia is nothing to be proud of, because Wikipedia is an affront to education, to scholarship and to the Enlightenment that spawned the notions of universal education from which the encyclopedic nostrum began.

Because to be associated with Wikipedia is not to be associated with some high moral principle but the very opposite - of the promotion of venality, political power games, historical revisionism, moral and intellectual cowardice and the promotion of the notion that a confluence of the opinions of ignoramuses constitutes an eventual path to Truth.

---JohnA, Wikipedia Review
Don Murphy is offline